Cookies on this website

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you click 'Accept all cookies' we'll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies and you won't see this message again. If you click 'Reject all non-essential cookies' only necessary cookies providing core functionality such as security, network management, and accessibility will be enabled. Click 'Find out more' for information on how to change your cookie settings.

There is contradictory evidence concerning non-random mating among melanic and non-melanic phenotypes of Adalia bipunctata. Although most studies have found a mating advantage in favour of melanic individuals, one found random mating. Furthermore, in some samples the melanic mating advantage was frequency-dependent though not in others. In one population males alone gained a frequency-dependent mating advantage, and it has been argued that this is a result of a female sexual preference. There is no direct evidence for mate choice from any other population. In any case, melanic individuals of both sexes often gain a mating advantage so if mate choice is relevant, then these populations must contain “choosy” males as well as “choosy” females. Some of these apparent contradictions are explained by insufficient sampling and/or unsatisfactory statistical analysis. Nevertheless, populations are clearly different from one another and this is important when considering the nature of the melanic mating advantage. © 1990, The Genetical Society of Great Britain.

Original publication

DOI

10.1038/hdy.1990.91

Type

Journal article

Journal

Heredity

Publication Date

01/01/1990

Volume

65

Pages

229 - 240