Response-adapted dasatinib de-escalation strategy compared to upfront Low-dose dasatinib: A prospective cohort study.

Halder R., Singh R., Rainchwar S., Bhatnagar S., Tikare N., Palatty R., Singh A., Soni M., Tripathi S., Panda T., Sheth V., Ahmed R., Agrawal N., Bhurani D.

Dose-optimization of dasatinib is an important strategy in chronic myeloid leukaemia (CML) to balance efficacy, safety, and cost. While Western studies have explored low-dose approaches, data from India remain limited. We conducted a comparative study of 143 newly diagnosed chronic-phase CML patients, allocated to dasatinib de-escalation (DD, n = 80) after an initial 100 mg standard dose or upfront low-dose (50 mg) dasatinib (LD, n = 63). At 3 months, a significantly higher proportion of patients in the DD cohort achieved BCR-ABL1 ≤ 10% compared to LD cohort (98.4% vs. 72.1%, p < 0.001). At 6 months, ≤ 1% BCR-ABL1 was observed in 98.3% vs 83% (p = 0.014), while at 12 months, MMR rates were comparable, 93.2% vs. 79.5% (p = 0.120). Median FFS was not reached in DD cohort and was 49 months in LD cohort, with an estimated 5-year FFS rates of 80% and 50%, respectively (p = 0.117). Treatment discontinuation was more frequent in LD cohort (29.5%) compared to DD cohort (6.9%). No patient progressed to advanced phase CML or died during follow-up. Dasatinib de-escalation after 100 mg standard dose achieved superior early response, fewer discontinuations, and sustained outcomes versus upfront low-dose therapy. This first Indian study supports de-escalation as an effective, real-world dose-optimization strategy.

DOI

10.1016/j.leukres.2026.108218

Type

Journal article

Publication Date

2026-03-28T00:00:00+00:00

Volume

165

Keywords

CML, Dasatinib, De-escalation, Low-dose, Response

Permalink More information Close