Cookies on this website

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you click 'Accept all cookies' we'll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies and you won't see this message again. If you click 'Reject all non-essential cookies' only necessary cookies providing core functionality such as security, network management, and accessibility will be enabled. Click 'Find out more' for information on how to change your cookie settings.

Multi-criteria optimization provides decision makers with a range of clinical choices through Pareto plans that can be explored during real time navigation and then converted into deliverable plans. Our study shows that dosimetric differences can arise between the two steps, which could compromise the clinical choices made during navigation.

Original publication

DOI

10.1016/j.radonc.2016.05.018

Type

Journal article

Journal

Radiother Oncol

Publication Date

08/2016

Volume

120

Pages

346 - 348

Keywords

Deliverable, Multi-criteria optimization, Navigated, Pareto fronts, Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung, Humans, Lung Neoplasms, Male, Prostatic Neoplasms, Radiometry, Radiotherapy Dosage, Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted, Radiotherapy, Intensity-Modulated, Retrospective Studies