Classification of variants of reduced penetrance in high-penetrance cancer susceptibility genes: Framework for genetics clinicians and clinical scientists by CanVIG-UK (Cancer Variant Interpretation Group-UK).
Garrett A., Allen S., Durkie M., Burghel GJ., Robinson R., Callaway A., Field J., Frugtniet B., Palmer-Smith S., Grant J., Pagan J., McDevitt T., Rowlands CF., McVeigh T., Hanson H., Turnbull C., CanVIG-UK None.
PURPOSE: Current practice is to report and manage likely pathogenic/pathogenic variants in a given cancer susceptibility gene as though having equivalent penetrance, despite increasing evidence of intervariant variability in risk associations. Using existing variant interpretation approaches, largely based on full-penetrance models, variants in which reduced penetrance is suspected may be classified inconsistently and/or as variants of uncertain significance. We aimed to develop a national consensus approach for such variants within the Cancer Variant Interpretation Group UK (CanVIG-UK) multidisciplinary network. METHODS: A series of surveys and live polls were conducted during and between CanVIG-UK monthly meetings on various scenarios potentially indicating reduced penetrance. These informed the iterative development of a framework for the classification of variants of reduced penetrance by the CanVIG-UK Steering and Advisory Group working group. RESULTS: CanVIG-UK recommendations for amendment of the 2015 ACMG/AMP variant interpretation framework were developed for variants in which (A) active evidence suggests a reduced-penetrance effect size (eg, from case-control or segregation data) and (B) reduced penetrance effect is inferred from weaker/potentially inconsistent observed data. CONCLUSION: CanVIG-UK propose a framework for the classification of variants of reduced penetrance in high-penetrance genes. These principles, although developed for cancer susceptibility genes, are potentially applicable to other clinical contexts.