Cookies on this website

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you click 'Accept all cookies' we'll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies and you won't see this message again. If you click 'Reject all non-essential cookies' only necessary cookies providing core functionality such as security, network management, and accessibility will be enabled. Click 'Find out more' for information on how to change your cookie settings.

In this paper we discuss an application integrating an ontological data model with an argumentation-based decision-support system, showing how the combination of leading technologies OWL, SPARQL and Jena can be used to achieve this. In the context of improving a decision support tool that is currently being trialled live in a clinical environment, we describe quantitatively how the incorporation of an ontology leads to an improvement over the existing software, highlighting the benefits of incorporating an ontology in medical applications. Data and clinical feedback is being collected from a live trial at the John Radcliffe hospital in Oxford, where we are able to test the original decision support tool, but also the ontology driven version, and thus will be able to demonstrate that any quantitative improvements in the efficacy of the software are a product of the ontological data model alone. Copyright © 2008.


Conference paper

Publication Date





1774 - 1775