Cookies on this website

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you click 'Accept all cookies' we'll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies and you won't see this message again. If you click 'Reject all non-essential cookies' only necessary cookies providing core functionality such as security, network management, and accessibility will be enabled. Click 'Find out more' for information on how to change your cookie settings.

PURPOSE: To explore poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA950) as an autoradiography substrate. MATERIALS AND METHODS: PMMA950 was spin coated onto a silicon substrate. Resists were exposed to either a 25 or 50 keV electron beam (e-beam) with fluences of 0.1-33.6 μC/cm(2). The resulting patterns were analyzed by atomic force microscopy (AFM). The dependence of pattern sensitivity and resolution on resist thickness, development time and electron energy was evaluated and correlated with Monte Carlo (MC) modeling. Conventional micro-autoradiography (MAR) images were compared to AFM images of photoresist patterns obtained following exposure from (111)In-diethylenetriaminepentaacetic acid (DTPA)-human epidermal growth factor (hEGF) (4-6 MBq/μg, 40 nM DTPA-hEGF)-treated human breast cancer cells MDA-MB-468. RESULTS: MC simulation results confirmed the similarity of particle transport in PMMA950 exposed to either an (111)In point source or a 25 keV e-beam. Sensitivity was inversely related to resist thickness. Development conditions of the resists greatly affected image quality. Sensitivity of PMMA950 was similar to the UVIII™ resist (consisting of a copolymer of 4-hydroxystyrene and t- butylacrylate) at low electron fluence for both 25 and 50 keV e-beam exposure. AFM evaluation of the exposure patterns from (111)In-DTPA-hEGF treated cells and nuclei provides more detailed information in comparison with that from MAR. CONCLUSIONS: Photoresist autoradiography can provide information on both the distribution of radiation sources and their strengths within a biological sample; however, the choice of photoresist material and processing conditions greatly affects the outcome.

Original publication

DOI

10.3109/09553002.2012.716927

Type

Journal article

Journal

Int J Radiat Biol

Publication Date

12/2012

Volume

88

Pages

933 - 940

Keywords

Autoradiography, Biological Transport, Cell Line, Tumor, Cell Nucleus, Electrons, Epidermal Growth Factor, Humans, Indium Radioisotopes, Intracellular Space, Monte Carlo Method, Pentetic Acid, Polymethyl Methacrylate