Cookies on this website
We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you click 'Continue' we'll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies and you won't see this message again. Click 'Find out more' for information on how to change your cookie settings.

This paper evaluates the performances of the OWL 2 reasoners HermiT, FaCT++ and Pellet in the context of an ontological clinical decision support system in lung cancer care. In the first set of experiments, we compare how the classification and realisation times of the LUCADA and LUCADA-SNOMED CT ontologies vary as we expand their TBoxes with additional guideline rule knowledge. In the second set of experiments, we investigate the effect of increasing the ABox of the LUCADA ontology on the realisation times.


Conference paper

Publication Date





81 - 86