Cookies on this website
We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you click 'Continue' we'll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies and you won't see this message again. Click 'Find out more' for information on how to change your cookie settings.

p53 expression detected by immunocytochemistry is emerging as a novel potentially useful prognostic indicator in breast carcinoma. However, additional research is warranted because a consensus has not yet been achieved on: i) methodology and quality control issues; ii) its association with other new biological prognostic indicators; iii) its prognostic value in multivariate analysis including conventional and new pathobiological features and; iv) its clinical usefulness either as a prognostic and predictive factor. This study was undertaken in a series of 165 early-stage breast cancer patients (median follow-up of 5 years) to compare the prognostic role of p53 expression with that of several other markers that have been found to be of value, using a multivariate statistical analysis. These factors are: tumour angiogenesis, epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), c-erbB-2 expression, cathepsin D, growth fraction by Ki-67 antibody, DNA ploidy and S-phase fraction. The main results observed were: i) 47 of 165 (28.5%) carcinomas had pAb 1801 staining and were considered as p53-positive; ii) p53 expression was weakly associated with S-phase fraction by flow cytometry (OR=1.86; p=0.085); iii) p53 expression was significantly associated with recurrence (p53 negative [-] versus weak positive [+] tumours: p=0.07 and odds ratio of 2.21; p53 negative [-] versus high positive [++] tumours: p=0.01 and odds ratio of 2.86) and death (p53-versus +: p=0.53 and odds ratio of 1.35; p53- versus ++: p=0.05 and odds ratio of 2.53); iv) the determination of p53 is able to identify a subset of high risk patients in c-erbB-2 negative tumours, this group being generally considered at good prognosis; v) In multivariate analysis on relapse-free survival including all the above markers only tumour angiogenesis, cathepsin D, EGFR and S-phase fraction and nodal status retained significance, and for overall survival only tumour angiogenesis was significant and independent. This new information on p53 expression could be useful to the clinician for a more rationale approach in defining prognosis of breast cancer patients. The prognostic value of p53 depends on which other markers are additionally analyzed and previous studies have not always assayed tumour angiogenesis, which is the most important factor in this series. p53 still need to be assessed as a potential predictor of response to chemo or radiotherapy, because of its role in monitoring DNA damage.

Original publication

DOI

10.3892/ijo.4.1.155

Type

Journal article

Journal

Int J Oncol

Publication Date

01/1994

Volume

4

Pages

155 - 162