Cookies on this website

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you click 'Accept all cookies' we'll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies and you won't see this message again. If you click 'Reject all non-essential cookies' only necessary cookies providing core functionality such as security, network management, and accessibility will be enabled. Click 'Find out more' for information on how to change your cookie settings.

<p>ART558 treatment leads to increased residual IR-induced DNA damage foci. <b>A,</b> γH2AX and 53BP1 foci in HCT116 and H460 cells treated with 3 μmol/L ART558 and 4 Gy IR, assessed at the indicated times points after IR. <b>B,</b> Representative images from irradiated cells from the experiment described in <b>A</b>, at 16 hours after IR. <b>C,</b> Micronuclei in HCT116 and H460 cells treated with 3 μmol/L ART558 and 4 Gy IR, assessed 48 hours after IR. Data points indicate the mean ± SD from triplicate wells and graphs are representative from three separate experiments. <b>D,</b> Representative images from irradiated cells from the experiment described in <b>C</b>. Micronuclei are indicated with arrow heads. dsDNA, double-stranded DNA. <b>E,</b> RAD51 foci in HCT116 and H460 cells treated with 3 μmol/L ART558 and 4 Gy IR, assessed 6 hours after IR. <b>F,</b> Representative images from irradiated cells from the experiment described in <b>E</b>. Lines and error bars in <b>A</b> and <b>E</b> correspond to average ± SD representative from three independent experiments, and statistical significance was calculated using nonparametric one-way ANOVA (Kruskal–Wallis) with Dunn correction for multiple comparisons (*, <i>P</i> < 0.05; **, <i>P</i> < 0.01; ***, <i>P</i> < 0.001; ****, <i>P</i> < 0.0001).</p>

Original publication

DOI

10.1158/1078-0432.30707644

Type

Other

Publication Date

25/11/2025